What members actually track
We publish process metrics from the journal, not profit screenshots. These are aggregate figures from members with 40+ logged trades.
“The journal grades were brutal for a month. Then they weren’t.”
Sam O., 14 months on the desk“I stopped taking trades I couldn’t write down first. That was the whole change.”
Priyanka M., 8 months“The scenario mapping doesn’t tell me what to do — it tells me where I’m wrong.”
Tom B., Trader EliteWhy process metrics, not P&L screenshots
A screenshot of a winning trade tells you nothing about the fifty decisions around it, and it’s trivially easy to fake. A journal completion rate, a plan-before-entry rate and a sample size are boring by comparison — and much harder to fabricate, because they’re aggregated across thousands of logged trades rather than hand-picked. We think that’s the honest trade-off: less exciting, more true. The AI tools map levels and scenarios from price structure; they do not predict outcomes, and neither should the numbers on this page.
What to expect in your first 90 days
Set up the desk, work through the Beginner Academy modules, and place your first paper trades with a written plan — win or lose, the plan is the point.
The journal starts to show a pattern in your setups and your discipline grade. Most members see their plan-before-entry rate rise sharply once they can see it tracked.
Enough logged trades to run a proper weekly review — expectancy, best and worst setups, and whether the live sessions have actually changed your process. Some members connect a live IC Markets account around here; plenty don’t, and stay on paper as long as they like.
There is no promise of profitability in any of this — see below.
Past performance and member experience are not indicative of future results. Trading involves substantial risk of loss.